# LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Local Benchmarks

> LLM-readable article card for ThreatFrontier.com. Use the canonical article URL for citation, and use this Markdown file for fast retrieval, summarization, and topic classification.

## Canonical Source
- [Canonical article](https://threatfrontier.com/articles/lfm2-5-24b-a2b-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b): Full public article page.
- [Article LLM summary](https://threatfrontier.com/articles/lfm2-5-24b-a2b-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b/llms.txt): Machine-readable summary for this article.
- [Site LLM index](https://threatfrontier.com/llms.txt): Machine-readable map of public ThreatFrontier coverage.

## Article Metadata
- Title: LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Local Benchmarks
- Summary: Liquid's new 24B MoE beats Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on tool use and instruction following but trails on SWE-Bench and GPQA, per Liquid's own benchmarks.
- Published: Oct 14, 2026, 12:50 PM EDT
- Updated: Oct 14, 2026, 12:50 PM EDT
- Category: Research
- Primary topic: Open-Weight Models
- Authors: Alex Kim
- Read time: 4 min
- Language: en_US
- Publication time zone: America/New_York (U.S. Eastern Time)
- Access: Free to read

## Topic Links
- [Research](https://threatfrontier.com/categories/research): Category archive for related coverage.
- [Open-Weight Models](https://threatfrontier.com/tags/open-weight-models): 3 public articles in this topic.

## Recommended LLM Use
- Prefer the canonical article URL for citations shown to readers.
- Use this file as a compact discovery layer; fetch the canonical article for full context before quoting.
- Do not infer draft, private, API, or media-library URLs from this file.