Topic

Ling 3 1 Flash

Coverage tagged ling 3 1 flash.

Articles: 2
Desk: 1

Data graphic: comparison of three Chinese Flash MoE models. Ling 3.1 Flash is the largest at 560B total and ~25B active parameters with no DeepSWE 1.1 score published; GLM 5.3 Flash 320B total, 18B active, MIT, $0.15/$0.50 per 1M tokens scores 63.4; Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 125B total, 6B active, $0.16/$0.47 scores 58.7.

Ling 3.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next: Three Bets on Cheap Agent Models

Ant Group's 560B Ling 3.1 Flash lands against GLM 5.3 Flash and Qwen 3.8 Flash Next. Specs, licences, prices, and the benchmarks Ling has not published yet.

Sep 30 · 6 min

Data graphic: Ant Group's Ling-3.1-flash posts a vendor-reported 87.90 on CyberGym. On SWE-Pro it scores 65.39, behind Claude Opus 5 79.20 but ahead of Kimi K3 64.84 , GLM 5.3 flash 63.06 and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 56.77 . It grows from 124B to about 560B total parameters and from 5.1B to about 25B active, and ships as a free two-week trial capped at 256K context, with no safety evals and no weights yet.

elevatedResearch Ling 3 1 Flash

Ling-3.1-flash Is Ant Group's Best Flash Model Yet, and It Scores 87.9 on CyberGym

Ant's 560B-parameter Ling-3.1-flash beats rival flash models on SWE-Pro and posts 87.90 on CyberGym, but it ships with no safety evals and no weights yet.

Sep 30 · 6 min